<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ken Rawlings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kenrawlings.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kenrawlings.com</link>
	<description>Tilting at Windmills Since 1970</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Dijkstra&#8217;s Three  Golden Rules by KenR</title>
		<link>http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2005/04/27/dijkstras-three-golden-rules/#comment-9261</link>
		<dc:creator>KenR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2005/04/27/dijkstras-three-golden-rules/#comment-9261</guid>
		<description>Sorry to hear about the EWD's being down. I can't imagine it will stay down for long.

As for OOP, I can't find the exact quote I remember, but I agree with the OCaml folks pragmatic viewpoint "on OOP vs. modules":http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/oreilly-book/html/book-ora151.html

 It all comes down to what form of extensibility you want going forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hear about the <span class="caps">EWD</span>&#8217;s being down. I can&#8217;t imagine it will stay down for long.</p>
<p>As for <span class="caps">OOP</span>, I can&#8217;t find the exact quote I remember, but I agree with the OCaml folks pragmatic viewpoint <a href="http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/oreilly-book/html/book-ora151.html" title="">on <span class="caps">OOP</span> vs. modules</a></p>
<p>It all comes down to what form of extensibility you want going forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Resharper 4.0 good news and a little WPF databinding by KenR</title>
		<link>http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2008/03/21/resharper-40-good-news-and-a-little-wpf-databinding/#comment-9260</link>
		<dc:creator>KenR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2008/03/21/resharper-40-good-news-and-a-little-wpf-databinding/#comment-9260</guid>
		<description>Do a Google blog search on Resharper and you'll find all sorts of details about Resharper that people love. Is it worth the money? I'm not thrilled about their upgrade policies (no maintenance available and 4.0 will be the 3rd paid upgrade in less than 2 years), but yes, it's absolutely worth the money. Try the trial version and see if you like it -- IIRC it's 30 days and I can vouch that the earlier versions at least uninstalled cleanly while I was evaluating them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do a Google blog search on Resharper and you&#8217;ll find all sorts of details about Resharper that people love. Is it worth the money? I&#8217;m not thrilled about their upgrade policies (no maintenance available and 4.0 will be the 3rd paid upgrade in less than 2 years), but yes, it&#8217;s absolutely worth the money. Try the trial version and see if you like it&#8212;<span class="caps">IIRC</span> it&#8217;s 30 days and I can vouch that the earlier versions at least uninstalled cleanly while I was evaluating them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dijkstra&#8217;s Three  Golden Rules by Philip Daniels</title>
		<link>http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2005/04/27/dijkstras-three-golden-rules/#comment-9259</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2005/04/27/dijkstras-three-golden-rules/#comment-9259</guid>
		<description>Anyone know if EWDs archives are mirrored someplace - cs.utexas.edu is off the air.  My favorite Dijkstra-ism

Object-oriented programming is an exceptionally bad idea which could only have originated in California.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know if EWDs archives are mirrored someplace &#8211; cs.utexas.edu is off the air.  My favorite Dijkstra-ism</p>
<p>Object-oriented programming is an exceptionally bad idea which could only have originated in California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Resharper 4.0 good news and a little WPF databinding by hans190271</title>
		<link>http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2008/03/21/resharper-40-good-news-and-a-little-wpf-databinding/#comment-9173</link>
		<dc:creator>hans190271</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2008/03/21/resharper-40-good-news-and-a-little-wpf-databinding/#comment-9173</guid>
		<description>I'm looking into buying resharper but don't know a whole lot about the 
product.  Is it worth spending the money.
What are the weaknesses and strengths .. i.e. what type of code redundancies can resharper fix ? (their page is kind of fuzzy about that )
Or .. if you know a link that has all this info . just send me an email .. and forget about this post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking into buying resharper but don&#8217;t know a whole lot about the<br />
product.  Is it worth spending the money.<br />
What are the weaknesses and strengths .. i.e. what type of code redundancies can resharper fix ? (their page is kind of fuzzy about that )<br />
Or .. if you know a link that has all this info . just send me an email .. and forget about this post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Consuming a WCF service from Flex Builder 3 by Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2008/03/20/consuming-a-wcf-service-from-flex-builder-3/#comment-8401</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 08:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2008/03/20/consuming-a-wcf-service-from-flex-builder-3/#comment-8401</guid>
		<description>Hello ken.
I need to comunicate Flex with .Net through WCF. I'm using basicHttpBinding but Flex Builder 3 can´t generate proxies. I think it doesn't recognize the wsdl. I used    http://MySite/MyService.svc?wsdl and also a mexHttpBinding but nothing worked. Client machine can show the service wsdl through IE.
Any Idea?
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello ken.<br />
I need to comunicate Flex with .Net through <span class="caps">WCF</span>. I&#8217;m using basicHttpBinding but Flex Builder 3 can&#180;t generate proxies. I think it doesn&#8217;t recognize the wsdl. I used    <a href="http://MySite/MyService.svc?wsdl" rel="nofollow">http://MySite/MyService.svc?wsdl</a> and also a mexHttpBinding but nothing worked. Client machine can show the service wsdl through IE.<br />
Any Idea?<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Resharper 4.0 good news and a little WPF databinding by KenR</title>
		<link>http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2008/03/21/resharper-40-good-news-and-a-little-wpf-databinding/#comment-8062</link>
		<dc:creator>KenR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2008/03/21/resharper-40-good-news-and-a-little-wpf-databinding/#comment-8062</guid>
		<description>Hi Ilya -- I left more details in a ReSharper feedback submission yesterday, but I know the two main constructs that were flagged as errors were related to scoping on "let" and "join". Later uses of the bindings introduced by each were flagged as errors.  I don't have access to code at the moment, but I'll send along a few actual queries later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ilya&#8212;I left more details in a ReSharper feedback submission yesterday, but I know the two main constructs that were flagged as errors were related to scoping on &#8220;let&#8221; and &#8220;join&#8221;. Later uses of the bindings introduced by each were flagged as errors.  I don&#8217;t have access to code at the moment, but I&#8217;ll send along a few actual queries later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Resharper 4.0 good news and a little WPF databinding by Ilya Ryzhenkov</title>
		<link>http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2008/03/21/resharper-40-good-news-and-a-little-wpf-databinding/#comment-8057</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Ryzhenkov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 08:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2008/03/21/resharper-40-good-news-and-a-little-wpf-databinding/#comment-8057</guid>
		<description>Could you please give us some examples of "non-trivial LINQ queries inside of static methods", which ReSharper doesn't understand? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you please give us some examples of &#8220;non-trivial <span class="caps">LINQ</span> queries inside of static methods&#8221;, which ReSharper doesn&#8217;t understand? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s Android SDK First Impressions by Google’s Android SDK First Impressions &#8212; Google Android</title>
		<link>http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2007/11/12/googles-android-sdk-first-impressions/#comment-7038</link>
		<dc:creator>Google’s Android SDK First Impressions &#8212; Google Android</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2007/11/12/googles-android-sdk-first-impressions/#comment-7038</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome to the new site! by Web Site Design</title>
		<link>http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2004/09/26/blogging-again/#comment-6991</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Site Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2004/09/26/blogging-again/#comment-6991</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Web Site Design...&lt;/strong&gt;

I couldn't understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web Site Design&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Parallel Programming, Silverlight, and the RSS Bandit parser by Building Silverlight Applications using .NET - ScottGus Blog &#171; The Pursuit of a Life</title>
		<link>http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2007/06/22/parallel-programming-silverlight-and-the-rss-bandit-parser/#comment-6843</link>
		<dc:creator>Building Silverlight Applications using .NET - ScottGus Blog &#171; The Pursuit of a Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 05:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenrawlings.com/archives/2007/06/22/parallel-programming-silverlight-and-the-rss-bandit-parser/#comment-6843</guid>
		<description>[...] (h/t Ken Rawlings) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (h/t Ken Rawlings) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
